Skip to content
Legal Center

Grievance Redressal Policy

Last Updated: February 2025

1. Introduction

Sajan International Private Limited (hereinafter referred as “the Company” or “SIPL”) a Non-Banking Financial Company (‘NBFC’) holding a valid Certificate of Registration (“CoR”) with Reserve Bank of India (‘RBI’) vide registration no.B-14.02036 dated 06-11-2015 under current RBI classification as NBFC - Investment and Credit Company (NBFC-ICC) – Non-Deposit taking Systemically Important (‘ICC-ND-SI’).

This Grievance Redressal Policy (“Policy”) is formulated in accordance with the:

  • Reserve Bank of India (Non-Banking Financial Companies – Credit Facilities) Directions, 2025.
  • Reserve Bank of India (Non-Banking Financial Companies – Responsible Business Conduct) Directions, 2025
  • The Information Technology Act, 2000, and other applicable laws.
  • Other applicable acts, regulations and rules which requires the publishing of a privacy policy for handling of or dealing in personal Information including sensitive personal data or Information and all applicable laws, regulations, directions, guidelines provided by applicable regulatory authorities, including but not limited to the Reserve Bank of India (“RBI”).

This Policy sets out the framework for receiving, addressing, and resolving customer grievances in a fair, transparent, and time-bound manner.

2. Basis

Customer service is extremely important for sustained business growth and as an organization we strive to ensure that our customers receive exemplary service across different touch points. Customer complaints constitute an important voice of customer, and this policy details complaint handling through a structured grievance redressal framework. Complaint redressal is supported by a review mechanism, to minimize the recurrence of similar issues in future.

3. Basic Principles

The Grievance Redressal Policy follows the following principles:

  • Customers are treated fairly at all times.
  • Complaints raised by customers are dealt with courtesy and in a timely manner.
  • Customers are informed of avenues to escalate their complaints within the organization, and their rights if they are not satisfied with the resolution of their complaints.
  • The employees work in good faith and without prejudice, towards the interests of the customers.

4. Grievance Redressal and Escalation Matrix

Customers may register their queries or complaints and escalate them through the defined matrix below:

Customer Issue / Grievance Initiated
Level 1

Service Channel

Initial Contact

Customers may raise their queries or complaints through the following service channels:

💬
Chat / Mobile Application
In-App Support
📞
Call
Telephonic Helpline
If Unresolved / Unsatisfied ➔ Escalate
Level 2

Grievance Redressal Officer

Internal Escalation
Officer:Ms. Ruma Riyaz
Address:106, BEST BUSINESS PARK, PLOT NO P2, NETAJI SUBHASH PLACE, Shakur Pur I Block, North West Delhi, Delhi, India, 110034
If Still Unresolved / Unsatisfied ➔ Escalate
Level 3

Nodal Officer

Higher Authority
Not Resolved within Prescribed Timeline / No Response Received ➔ Statutory Escalation
Level 4

RBI Ombudsman

Regulatory Authority

If the complaint is not resolved to the customer's satisfaction within the prescribed timeline, or where the customer has not received a response within the applicable period, the customer may approach the Reserve Bank – Integrated Ombudsman Scheme (RB-IOS).

Mode of Complaint:Online / Email / Physical Letter

5. Review and monitoring

Periodic review of monitoring of complaints, TATs, nature of complaints is done to ensure that process loopholes if any are plugged and trends are checked. In case the IO upholds the decision of the Company to reject/partly reject the complaint, the reply to the customer should explicitly state the fact that the complaint has been examined by the Internal Ombudsman and, for the reasons stated in the reply, the decision of the Company has been upheld.

In case the Internal Ombudsman overrules the decision of the Company to reject/partly reject the complaint, the Company can disagree with the decision of the Internal Ombudsman with the approval of the Executive Director/Managing Director/Chief Executive Officer as may be applicable. In such cases, the reply to the complainant shall explicitly state the fact that the complaint was examined by the Internal Ombudsman and the decision of the Company was overruled by the Internal Ombudsman in favour of the complainant; however, the Company, with the approval of the Managing Director/Chief Executive Officer, has disagreed with the decision of the Internal Ombudsman. All such cases shall be subsequently reviewed on a quarterly basis by the Board of the Company.

S
Sajan International
Official Policy